Witnesses gave conflicting testimony in the case of Zarema Musaeva

On September 29, a regular hearing in the case of Zarema Musaeva took place in the Grozny court. The witnesses questioned in court - witnesses who were allegedly present during her identification in the pre-trial detention center - gave contradictory testimony.
Let us remind you: Zarema Musaeva, the wife of ex-judge of the Supreme Court of Chechnya Saydi Yangulbaeva, the mother of human rights activist Abubakar Yangulbaev and oppositionist, author of the 1ADAT telegram channel Ibragim Yangulbaev, is accused of attacking a police officer and fraud. Human rights activists at Memorial, which was liquidated in Russia, recognized her as a political prisoner and stated that “the persecution of Musayeva cannot be viewed as anything other than taking her hostage for the purpose of returning and punishing the men of the family for reasons of personal revenge.”
Zarema Musaeva was detained by police on January 20, 2022 in her apartment in Nizhny Novgorod and taken to Grozny. Since then she has been in jail. The court refused to transfer her to house arrest, despite her serious illness. On September 7, the court extended her preventive measure until December 12.
According to the Committee against Torture, on September 29, the court interrogated two witnesses who were present during the identification of Musaeva in the pre-trial detention center. One of them said that he saw extras - people who are presented at an identification parade along with the suspect or accused - even before the start of the investigative action. Another said that the extras were already waiting in the pre-trial detention center with Zarema Musaeva, but they did not look like her (which violates the procedure for conducting identification). In addition, according to the witness, during the identification process Zarema stood while the extras sat. “These facts exclude identification as such,” summed up Musaeva’s lawyer, Alexander Karavaev.
Meanwhile, the Investigative Department of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Nizhny Novgorod Region decided to investigate the facts of abuse of power by the police officers who detained Musaeva.
The investigation was initiated by Team Against Torture lawyers. Over the eight months since their arrest, they filed 21 petitions, 24 complaints, 12 appeals, three requests and three statements about abuse of power by law enforcement officers.
Earlier, in response to their complaints, the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic stated that the forced delivery of Zarema Musaeva to Grozny from Nizhny Novgorod was legal. However, in May, the CPT lawyers received a resolution from the Investigative Department of the Investigative Committee of Russia for the Chechen Republic to separate the investigation materials from the criminal case against Zarema Musaeva and transfer them to the Investigative Department of the Investigative Committee of Russia for the Nizhny Novgorod Region under paragraph “a” of Part 3 of Art. 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (exceeding official powers with the use of violence or the threat of its use).
“Now we expect that Nizhny Novgorod investigators will still have to study the video, order forensic examinations, interview eyewitnesses and police officers,” Reporter-NN quotes CPT lawyer Sergei Shunin.

Последние новости
Эксперт объяснил несовместимость позиций Москвы и Еревана по референдуму о вступлении Армении в ЕС
Politics
Эксперт объяснил несовместимость позиций Москвы и Еревана по референдуму о вступлении Армении в ЕС
5 September 2026

Встреча Владимира Путина и Никола Пашиняна в Бишкеке, как и ожидалось, не сняла главного противоречия в отношениях Москвы и Еревана — вопроса о том, готова ли Армения сделать окончательный выбор между евразийской и европейской интеграцией. При этом, как считает ведущий научный сотрудник Института международных исследований МГИМО Сергей Маркедонов, Москва и Ереван занимают принципиально разные позиции по вопросу о проведении референдума, на котором Армения могла бы определиться с выбором своего дальнейшего внешнеполитического курса. В Telegram-канале «Донской Казак» Маркедонов обращает внимание на то, что Москва заинтересована в том, чтобы Ереван как можно скорее определился между двумя интеграционными векторами. Руководство Армении, напротив, явно не торопится выносить этот вопрос на общенациональное голосование.

Justice in the Bin’: ECHR Drops Nearly 1,000 Cases Against Russia, Most Filed by North Caucasus Residents
Human rights
Justice in the Bin’: ECHR Drops Nearly 1,000 Cases Against Russia, Most Filed by North Caucasus Residents
5 September 2026

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg has struck out 879 remaining applications against Russia involving more than 1,500 individuals and organisations. The Memorial Human Rights Centre described the decision as “unprecedented in the practice of the [ECHR], and indeed in the history of international justice as a whole”.

Diplomacy Gives Way to Brashness: Zakharova Turns to *Heart of a Dog* to Answer Pashinyan
Politics
Diplomacy Gives Way to Brashness: Zakharova Turns to *Heart of a Dog* to Answer Pashinyan
4 September 2026

Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova responded sarcastically to Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s statement regarding the 102nd Russian military base in Gyumri by quoting Mikhail Bulgakov’s novella *Heart of a Dog*.

The court denied 52 defense motions in the case of the
Human rights
The court denied 52 defense motions in the case of the "fifth Bakhchisarai group."
4 September 2026

On August 31, the Southern District Military Court in Rostov-on-Don rejected all 52 motions filed by the defense in the case of the so-called "fifth Bakhchisarai group." Judge Roman Saprunov rendered the ruling as part of the panel of judges. This was reported by Amina Seitumerova, the wife of political prisoner Abdulmedzhit Seitumerov, who is a defendant in the case.